I write for my own viewing pleasure

Jun 10, 2005

May 27th + x days

Can life be summed up mathematically? Probably John Nash could. But could Mark Yang do the same?

Because fate was thrown into the equation earlier on, it got even more complicated. It eluded me completely, and reveal the complexity I failed to fortell that was so cleverly masked. Underestimating it was a grave mistake but solving it wrongly was even graver.

Was it solved illogically?
Was it solved not in accordance to formulaes?
Was mathematical axioms misinterpreted?
Was I, in my quest to solve it quickly, skipped a step?
Was it calculated wrongly?

As the number of possibilities wax, the bond wanes.

How much time can i hold out?

Until the sloping curve (negative gradient) which represents the withering bond intersects with the straight line of futility in a plotted graph of bond against time. Beyond that would a Point of no return.

With that much time, do i still have what it takes? They say perseverance yields success but with destiny conspicuosly obstructing me, am I able to muster enough courage and defiance to surmount what fate seems to be illustrating?

Finding the final jigsaw piece to solve it is like finding a needle in the haystack but old school quotes do not lie, and with this, i brace myself, albeit with more confidence to solve it while keeping track of x days where x < point of no return.

.

1 Comments:

  • I find your pseudo use of mathematical logic amusing and entertaining ~_~, therefore I shall provide you with the one equation which is the most important, and one you should always remember with all your heart.

    Fabian > Mark.

    One last thing you can nvr solve an equation with fate, just ride man! Weeeeeeeeeeeettttttt! Similiarly maths cannot solve relationships.

    Catcha later so we can act the fool.

    By Blogger Fabian wrote this..., At 6/11/2005 9:27 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]



<< Home